What King is saying here is that nonviolent resistance is
   effective in making change possible, but that it does not create anger or
   hurt.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a disciple of Mahatma Gandhi and
   Henry David Thoreau, two of the main proponents of the idea that people should resist injustice
   by nonviolent means. King believed that nonviolent resistance was both more effective and more
   ethical than violent resistance. This view is shown in the statement that you cite. King believes
   that nonviolence "cuts" (it works, it is effective) but yet is ethical because it does not bring
   harm to those it is directed at (it does not "wound"). This is because it treats them with
   respect and does not give them any reason to feel angry at those who are
   resisting.
No comments:
Post a Comment