From the bland, empty affirmation of religious belief in
the first line, through the piling up of stock patriotic phrases rendered meaningless by
being pulled out of context (and syntactical wholeness), culminating in the string of
idiotic interjections in lines 7 and 8, Cummings’ssense of the ridiculousness of the
rhetoric and the meretriciousness of the orator is all but palpable. In lines 9–12,
the speech maker plays a particularly nasty kind of moral trump card, manipulating the
sacrifices of the war dead to close off debate, followed by the reflexive and
hypocritical lip service to liberty in line 13. He is saying, in effect: We honor our
heroes for their defense of our freedoms, but anyone who exercises those freedoms to
dissent from my views is unpatrioticorworse. And then the entire speech is neatly
deflated by the poem’s final line.
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
In "next to of course god america i" Cummings plays with syntax. How does his form fit with what he is saying in the poem?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How is Anne's goal of wanting "to go on living even after my death" fulfilled in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl?I didn't get how it was...
I think you are right! I don't believe that many of the Jews who were herded into the concentration camps actually understood the eno...
-
This is a story of one brother's desire for revenge against his older brother. Owen Parry and his brother own a large farm, ...
-
No doubt you have studied the sheer irony of this short story, about a woman whose secret turns out to be that she ...
-
To determine the number of choices of the farmer, we'll apply combinations. We'll recall the formula of the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment