Wednesday, October 1, 2014

How do you define the word barbarian before and after you have read Waiting for the Barbarians?

Good question because J.M. Coetzee changes our ideas of
barbarians.  Before the novel I understood "barbarian" to refer to uncivilized people, savages.
 But after the reading the novel, I see that perhaps there is not much difference between savages
and civilized.


In this unnamed village, fear of barbarian attacks
causes Colonel Joll to seek out savages who live close by and bring them in for questioning and
torture.  These scenes are quite brutal.  Fear of the barbarians causes the supposedly civilized
members of the Empire (could it be the British?  I think Coetzee is implying that the Empire is
comprised of the British), to act in the most inhumane ways toward innocent natives.  Their
brutality is presented as savage, as the threat of a barbarian attack seems more and more
unlikely.  The members of the Empire become image of those they deem their
enemies.


The Magistrate--the narrator and main character--exploits
the natives as well, but he makes the attempt to atone for his past abuses.  He befriends a
native girl who has been blinded through the interrogation.  His intentions toward her are not
always innocent, but he does journey to return her to her people, and later faces the wrath of
Colonel Joll, an official of the Empire, and endures torture for his
disloyalty.


In a way the theme is similar to Conrad's
Heart of Darkness.  We are all savage underneath.  In this work, fear of
outsiders reduces the civilized to savage, while power leads to exploitation and
excesses.


The barbarians are anyone and everyone who is inhumane,
brutal, and exploitive.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How is Anne's goal of wanting "to go on living even after my death" fulfilled in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl?I didn't get how it was...

I think you are right! I don't believe that many of the Jews who were herded into the concentration camps actually understood the eno...