I think that there is much validity in Hugo's statement. The
fundamental precepts of liberalism are found in Romanticism. For example, liberalism's stress on
individual rights is very close intellectually to the idea of placing primacy on the subjective
experience. Both elements seek to locate power and understanding the nature of the universe with
the individual and not an external force. Liberalism's stress on individual freedom and the idea
of the individual being able to pursue any path is similar to Romanticism's idea of being able to
break from conformist notions of the good and allow individual choice to determine how life is to
be lived. The liberal idea of power coming from the people and democratic self autonomy is
similar to the Romantic idea of individuals acting on their own subjectivity and being the agent
of action in their own world. Finally, the element of social transformation which is intrinsic to
liberal thought is found in the Romantic call for individuals to transform what is in to what
should be. The Romantic demand for social change is echoed in the liberal pursuit of social
justice. In these ways, Hugo might have been accurate in suggesting that Romanticism was
"liberalism in literature."
Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Victor Hugo defines Romanticism as "Liberalism in Literature." Justify this statement with reference to 19th Romantic thought.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How is Anne's goal of wanting "to go on living even after my death" fulfilled in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl?I didn't get how it was...
I think you are right! I don't believe that many of the Jews who were herded into the concentration camps actually understood the eno...
-
This is a story of one brother's desire for revenge against his older brother. Owen Parry and his brother own a large farm, ...
-
No doubt you have studied the sheer irony of this short story, about a woman whose secret turns out to be that she ...
-
To determine the number of choices of the farmer, we'll apply combinations. We'll recall the formula of the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment