It can be difficult at times to distinguish between
            indirect and direct characterisation. However, direct characterisation can only ever
            occur in a story with a third person point of view, as it is when the writer tells us
            directly about what a character is like or what a person's motives are. Indirect
            characterisation is anything that allows us to infer something about a character, but it
            is not stated directly.
For example, in the story, we can
            tell through the setting and action that Jim and Della are poor. Consider how their
            apartment is described:
readability="7">
A furnished flat at $8 per week. It did not
            exactly beggar description, but it certainly had that word on the lookout for the
            mendicancy squad.
This is
            indirect characterisation - the author does not tell us directly that they are poor, but
            it is made clear indirectly through their setting.
However,
            later on, the author uses direct characterisation to tell us about the motives of Della
            and her purpose for saving money:
readability="7">
Tomorrow would be Christmas Day and she had only
            $1.87 to buy a present for Jim. Her Jim. Many a happy hour she had spent planning for
            something nice for him. Something fine and rare and sterling - something just a little
            bit near to being worthy of the honour of being owned by
            Jim.
Note here how the author
            directly tells us her motives for saving the money and how much she loves him. This is
            clearly an example of direct characterisation, as it directly reveals to us information
            about Della and her motives for trying to save money.
Hope
            this helps! Good luck finding more examples in this great short
            story.
No comments:
Post a Comment