In Fahrenheit 451 (1953), there is no
            freedom in this futuristic society. (Ray Bradbury wrote this book in response to
            McCarthyism and the censorship of artistic expression in America at that
            time.)
The most obvious and central oppression in the novel
            is against the owning or reading of books. Guy Montag, the protagonist, is a fireman
            whose job it is to burn books—and sometimes the homes that contain these
            books.
This society controls everything, including what
            people know and learn, and therefore it also controls their thinking and behavior, for
            one cannot think and behave as a "growing entity" without knowledge.  (This behavior is
            also reminiscent of Hitler and his burning of books during his tyrannical move
            throughout Europe in the 1930s and 1940s.  As seen then, and in this
            book, the loss of knowledge—of intellectual freedom—leads to
            self-annihilation.)
readability="26">
Don't step on the toes of the dog
            lovers, the cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchant, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists,
            Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites,
            Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico. The bigger your market, Montag, the less you
            handle controversy
            (57).
This quote, eerily
            reflective of today's society, explains what brought about the banning of books: people
            were robbed of the right to think, speak, and write freely because of the people who
            were offended by free thoughts and free speech.
Even today,
            what is "politically correct" becomes not only awkward, but, in some cases, ridiculous.
            "Political correctness" has become the tail that wags the dog, and something is lost in
            trying to please everyone.  In many ways, no one is satisfied, and
            what needs to be addressed is sometimes left unsaid, or "cleaned up" so that what
            is said lacks conviction, and, therefore, credibility.  After all,
            if Thomas Paine or Thomas Jefferson had been concerned with "political correctness,"
            where would we be today?
No comments:
Post a Comment