Hamlet's character is plagued by indecision and inaction,
            which causes him to delay taking revenge for his father's murder. There are a number of
            examples, but three that I think would be the most important
            are:
1. At the end of Act I, Hamlet finds out from the
            ghost of his late father that he was in fact murdered by his brother. Hamlet had a hunch
            that this is what happened, but now he's got it from the mouth of the ghost himself.
            Yet, at the beginning of Act II, he decides to create a new ruse through the players, in
            order to make doubly sure that he would be acting correctly in murdering King Claudius.
            Hamlet states, at the end of his soliloquy in Act II scene ii: "The play's the thing
            wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king."
2. Hamlet
            has a chance to kill his Uncle when he catches him alone in Act III, scene iii. He
            doesn't however, because by doing so when he's praying, he would "this same villain
            send/ To heaven." This would not be revenge enough, so he decides not to do
            it.
3. Hamlet finally decides that "from this time forth,/
            My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth" (IV.iv). The only problem is that when he
            decides this, he's being sent away to England. He's finally decided to do something
            about the revenge his father required of him, but he's going away from the target, under
            the target's orders.
These three elements of the play begin
            to illustrate the delays under which Hamlet operates.
No comments:
Post a Comment