Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Why do you think the author chose to "call" the main character as he did?

If by "call" you mean why did the author portray the
character in the way he did, with the ending the story has, my impression would be that
O'Flaherty is trying to impress upon the reader, not only what war can do, but to draw
attention to the terrible fighting that went on in Ireland for many, many
years.


This story is about civil war in Ireland, between
the Republicans and the Free Staters. As with the Civil War in this country, the
politics divided families onto opposite sides of the
battle.


The description the author presents of our
protagonist is that of a young man, who is good at what he does, but who is also
something of a fanatic. As the story begins, he is wound up and very tense.  He is
eating now because he has not eaten all day: he's been too
nervous.


In the story, the sniper is there to do a job. He
does not personify the people he kills: he is killing the enemy, and they are faceless
victims. When he kills the men in the armored tank, he goes ahead and kills the old
woman who tried to tell the men in the tank where the sniper was located.  The fact that
she is an old woman means nothing to him. The only way he can effectively do his job is
to separate himself from any emotions while he carries out his
duties.


When the sniper kills the old woman, a sniper on
another roof wounds the protagonist. Though it does not kill him, he knows he cannot
shoot his rifle again.


Rather than packing up and going to
find medical attention, the sniper dresses his own wound and then methodically goes
about trying to draw out the other sniper in order to kill
him.


Ultimately, by tricking the other man, the first
sniper is able to kill his adversary. At first, viewing this man as a fine shot and a
worthy adversary, the sniper is full of rage about the realities of war and the waste of
human life, and he nearly kills himself when he throws the revolver he used violently
onto the ground, where it misfires.


Finally pulling himself
together, the sniper climbs down from the roof and decides to see if he knows the other
sniper, perhaps from an old regiment. However, when he turns the man over, he is looking
into the face of his dead brother.


The ending never fails
to shock and appall the reader. O'Flaherty artfully lures us into the story, keeps the
excitement high, and then pulls the rug out from under us. However, he is once again
trying to bring to the reader's attention that although the sniper endeavors to keep it
"non-personal," this is really impossible: war is personal. To kill
means to take the life of another human being. In this case, it is more horrible than
the sniper could imagine, as he has taken the life of his
brother.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How is Anne's goal of wanting "to go on living even after my death" fulfilled in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl?I didn't get how it was...

I think you are right! I don't believe that many of the Jews who were herded into the concentration camps actually understood the eno...