While Poe's story is apparently told from third-person objective
   point of view with a narrator recounting an allegorical story, there are other interpretations of
   Poe's narrator in "The Masque of the Red Death."
One interpretation
   of Poe's narrator is that of Leonard Cassuto who contends the narration is that of the Red Death
   himself.  Since Prince Prospero dies about a paragraph and a half before the end of the story,
   this interpretation certainly seems plausible.  Added to this, the last line appears to express a
   rather victorious view:
readability="6">
And the flames of the tripods expired.  And Darkness and
   Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over
   all.
Another interpretation--somewhat
   Freudian, it seems--holds that the narrator is the subconscious of Prince Prospero himself. 
   Thus, the narrative is the workings of his mind as he wrestles with his own mortality and his
   death is not literal, but psychological.  Still, yet another interpretation holds that "The
   Masque of the Red Death" is a Biblical morality tale in which God sends a pestilence to punish
   the people for their evil and debauchery.  As such, the narrator, then, is a divine
   being.
Perhaps, the ambiguity of who is the narrator of his macabre
   story make exist because Poe wishes to express what Ugo Betti has
   written:
Every tiny
part of us cries out against the idea of dying, and hopes to
live forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment