One of the chief differences between these two characters
            lies in the way that they respond to their father's death. Happy seems likely to
            reproduce the characteristics that his father displayed. He insists that he is going to
            show that Willy Loman did not die in vain and that he is going to "win it" for him. Yet
            competitiveness has already been shown in the play to be ultimately fruitless though it
            sustains the capitalist system. Biff's claim that his father "never knew who he was" and
            that he himself does suggests that he will move away from his father's model for
            success.
This itself raises another crucial difference
            between the two brothers. At the beginning of the play, both are described as "lost",
            but it is Happy who oozes confidence and refuses to give in throughout. Biff, on the
            other hand, changes from a "lost" boy to a man of some insight and responsibility.
            Notice how Biff and Happy clash about revealing the truth about Bill Oliver. It is clear
            that Biff is sensitive and caring and loves his family deeply, but in the end the
            kindest thing he can do is to be cruel and force everyone to face the truth. This is why
            he reveals that fact the he has been in prison for
            debt.
Although, by the end of the play, it is clear that
            Biff does not precisely offer a counterbalance against the imaginary excesses of his
            father, in his protestations that he is an ordinary man with no pretensions at the end
            of the play he seems to be identified as the character who has the clearest
            understanding of what has gone wrong in the family, and, in this sense, he perhaps
            represents some hope for the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment