Friday, May 4, 2012

In "Lamb to the Slaughter", should Mary Maloney be punished for the murder of her husband?

Should is a very different verb from will. The end of this
excellent short story makes it very clear that Mary Maloney has managed to get away with
the murder, as she involves the policemen in hiding the murder weapon for her
permanently as they eat the leg of lamb that she has just roasted and given them to
eat.


However, if you are looking at the evidence from the
reader's point of view, I think there is very definitely a case for her getting off with
temporary insanity or something like that. Note how the actual murder is
described:



At
that point Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause she swung the
big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the
back of his head.



It is clear
that this was unpremeditated, and was brought around by the shock of discovering that he
was going to leave her. We are also told that she was in "shock" with what she did.
Clearly, her position as a pregnant wife who has just found out that her husband is
probably having an affair and leaving her for another woman would have enabled her to
get off in the hands of a good lawyer. But remember - the beauty of this darkly humorous
story is that she is able to provide the perfect alibi for herself and destroy the
murder weapon.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How is Anne's goal of wanting "to go on living even after my death" fulfilled in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl?I didn't get how it was...

I think you are right! I don't believe that many of the Jews who were herded into the concentration camps actually understood the eno...