I have scanned the paragraph as you have
   asked.
I am mostly familiar with iambic pentameter, which is when a
   poem has ten syllables per line, with the stress on every other
   syllable.
Sonnets (fourteen-line poems) by Shakespeare, Petrarch,
   Spenser, etc., were written in iambic pentameter.
In your poem, if I
   have counted correctly, it appears to me that all the lines expect
   one have ten syllables per line, with a stress on the second of the two
   syllables.
For instance, refer to the first line of the
   paragraph:
Therefore
all seasons shall be sweet to thee
The
   stress lies on: -fore, sea-, shall, sweet, thee.  The stress does not follow words, but
   syllables. There are times (as with the first two listed above) that the first syllable is paired
   with part of the following word, or part of a word is joined with the word following
   it.
So "Therefore" has two syllables, and "-fore" is stressed. The
   next foot is "all sea-" and "sea-" is stressed. The second half of "season" (-son) is the first
   syllable of the next foot: "-sons shall."
readability="5">
There -fore / all sea- / -sons shall / be sweet / to
   thee
This continues up until the line
   below.
Smokes in the
sun-thaw ; whether the eave-drops
fall
This sentence does not follow the
   pattern. Now, this is written some time between the end of the 18th Century into the middle of
   the 19th Century. Coleridge was one of the two poets who are considered the forerunners of the
   Romantic literary movement in England.
I mention this only because
   poets (Shakespeare is a perfect example—and Coleridge as an English writer would have been
   influenced to some extent) would sometimes write in iambic pentameter, but some lines would have
   ten syllables, some would have eleven, and others might only have nine. The "irregular" numbered
   "feet" did not dominate the poem, but they were there.
For instance,
   in Sonnet 29, Shakespeare's third line is not written in iambic
   pentameter:
readability="6">
And trouble deaf heaven with my bootless
   cries,
It is possible to
   surmise that the line shown above (from "Frost at Midnight") simply does not fit the pattern
   because Coleridge wanted to say something specifically that would not fit with the prescribed
   number of syllables.
Sometimes poets (and song writers—who write
   poetry to music) will add a word and rush two syllables together to "fit." Consider the word
   "o'er." This is pronounced "or" (a one-syllable word), but actually means "over," a two-syllable
   word. So perhaps Coleridge intended that when the poem was read, one of the two-syllable words
   would be "rushed" or "pushed" together.
Considering the possibility
   that Coleridge purposely chose a different number of syllables, I am unable to chart the line
   which has eleven syllables. To make it fit into the ten syllable pattern (with a stress on the
   second syllable), "whether" would need be said quickly—seeming the only place where such a "rush"
   can be used and the line not only still make sense, but be able to hold onto the rhythm presented
   in the other lines as well.
readability="5">
Smokes in the sun-thaw ; whether the eave-drops
   fall
spoken "Smokes in / the
   sun / -thaw whether / the eave- / drops
   fall"
The only other possibility I can
   perceive might be that the foot "-thaw whether" might be an "anapest" (three
   syllables, with stress on the last), considered a "trisyllable" (whereas iambs are
   "disyllables").
I hope this is of some help.
No comments:
Post a Comment